BITY vs. IYRI
BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -38.86% vs 9.17% for IYRI. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IYRI.
Performance
BITY vs. IYRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -26.32% return, which is significantly lower than IYRI's 7.08% return.
BITY
- 1D
- -3.55%
- 1M
- -17.96%
- YTD
- -26.32%
- 6M
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -38.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITY vs. IYRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -26.32% | -7.84% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 7.08% | 6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITY and IYRI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITY vs. IYRI — Risk / Return Rank
BITY
IYRI
BITY vs. IYRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITY | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.16 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.22 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 4.37 | -5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITY vs. IYRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -50.04%, which is greater than IYRI's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and IYRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITY | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.04% | -12.12% | -37.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.04% | -7.53% | -42.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.77% | -0.52% | -47.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -1.69% | -19.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.55% | 2.10% | +26.45% |
Volatility
BITY vs. IYRI - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) at 4.21%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITY | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.74% | 4.21% | +9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.91% | 7.94% | +23.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.04% | 10.80% | +30.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 13.20% | +26.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 13.20% | +26.32% |
BITY vs. IYRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IYRI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITY vs. IYRI - Dividend Comparison
BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.39%, more than IYRI's 11.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 41.39% | 21.53% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 11.96% | 11.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITY and IYRI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITY has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to IYRI (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -50.04% vs IYRI's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 9.17% vs -38.86% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 9.17% return vs -38.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IYRI.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 41.39%, compared with 11.96% for IYRI.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.68% for IYRI.
IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITY and IYRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer