BITY vs. ILS

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -37.84% vs 7.01% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

BITY vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -24.08% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 2.02% return.

BITY

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -16.54%
• YTD: -24.08%
• 6M: -22.54%
• 1Y: -37.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-24.08%	-7.84%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	2.02%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and ILS is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

BITY vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 94
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITY	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	2.69	-3.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.29	4.34	-5.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.59	-0.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	12.73	-13.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	46.61	-47.96

BITY vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITY vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -50.04%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.04%	-2.46%	-47.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.04%	-0.55%	-49.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.19%	0.00%	-46.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.56%	-0.55%	-20.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.09%	0.16%	+27.93%

Volatility

BITY vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.90%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITY	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.15%	0.90%	+12.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.64%	1.68%	+29.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.85%	2.62%	+38.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.46%	3.79%	+35.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.46%	3.79%	+35.67%

BITY vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITY vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.17%, more than ILS's 8.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	40.17%	21.53%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.07%	6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITY and ILS in my portfolio?

BITY and ILS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITY or ILS?

BITY has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to ILS (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -50.04% vs ILS's -2.46%.

Which ETF is better, BITY or ILS?

On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.01% vs -37.84% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITY or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.01% return vs -37.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITY or ILS?

BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITY or ILS?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 40.17%, compared with 8.07% for ILS.

What is the main difference between BITY and ILS?

BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.