BITX vs. MARA
BITX (2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%), while MARA (Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, BITX returned -73.21% vs -8.94% for MARA. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BITX vs. MARA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITX achieves a -52.31% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's 55.46% return.
BITX
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -34.65%
- YTD
- -52.31%
- 6M
- -58.66%
- 1Y
- -73.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARA
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 18.01%
- YTD
- 55.46%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- -8.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- -10.53%
- 10Y*
- -10.91%
BITX vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -52.31% | -38.71% | 163.41% | 47.23% |
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 55.46% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 75.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITX and MARA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BITX and MARA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITX vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank
BITX
MARA
BITX vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITX | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.05 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.13 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | -0.21 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITX | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | -0.12 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -0.09 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
BITX vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITX drawdown since its inception was -78.92%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITX and MARA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITX | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.92% | -99.74% | +20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.92% | -70.53% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -78.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -95.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.92% | -90.98% | +12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -78.00% | +46.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.03% | 42.03% | +8.00% |
Volatility
BITX vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) at 16.33%. This indicates that BITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITX | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.24% | 16.33% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.07% | 58.00% | +11.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.83% | 77.65% | +9.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.27% | 105.79% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.27% | 144.06% | -45.79% |
Dividends
BITX vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison
BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.24%, while MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 33.24% | 21.69% | 10.70% |
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITX and MARA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITX has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to MARA (16.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITX dropped -78.92% vs MARA's -99.74%.
MARA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITX and MARA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer