PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITU vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -55.56% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return.


BITU

1D
-5.61%
1M
-40.78%
YTD
-55.56%
6M
-61.06%
1Y
-73.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-55.56%-37.07%37.90%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and TQQQ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITUTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.39

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

3.60

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

11.77

-13.25

BITU vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITUTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

2.80

-3.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.74

-1.10

Drawdowns

BITU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -80.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITUTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.13%

-81.66%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.13%

-36.97%

-43.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.13%

-2.29%

-77.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.58%

-18.52%

-16.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.09%

11.28%

+38.81%

Volatility

BITU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.35%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITUTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.31%

13.35%

+4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.43%

36.04%

+32.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.07%

47.60%

+39.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.43%

66.50%

+30.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.43%

65.95%

+31.48%

BITU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITU and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BITU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.31%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
88.31%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITU and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to TQQQ (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -80.13% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 132.34% vs -73.89% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 132.34% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITU and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.

BITU is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITU and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer