BITU vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITU is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BITU returned -73.89% vs 60.52% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BITU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -55.56% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 39.90% return.

BITU

• 1D: -5.61%
• 1M: -40.78%
• YTD: -55.56%
• 6M: -61.06%
• 1Y: -73.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: 5.56%
• 1M: 60.49%
• YTD: 39.90%
• 6M: 53.41%
• 1Y: 60.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-55.56%	-37.07%	104.54%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	39.90%	-29.11%	-76.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and BTCZ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	-1.00

The correlation between BITU and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BITU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITU	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	0.69	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.48	1.45	-2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.17	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	1.24	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	2.36	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITU vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITU	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.85	0.69	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	-0.55	+0.19

Drawdowns

BITU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -80.13%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITU	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.13%	-91.06%	+10.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.13%	-49.02%	-31.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.13%	-77.44%	-2.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.58%	-73.73%	+39.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.09%	25.76%	+24.33%

Volatility

BITU vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) at 17.24%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITU	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.31%	17.24%	+1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	68.43%	67.20%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.07%	87.54%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.43%	97.10%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.43%	97.10%	+0.33%

BITU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITU and BTCZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BITU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.31%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	88.31%	50.23%	0.12%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITU and BTCZ in my portfolio?

BITU and BTCZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITU or BTCZ?

BITU has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to BTCZ (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -80.13% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

Which ETF is better, BITU or BTCZ?

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 60.52% vs -73.89% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 17.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITU or BTCZ?

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 60.52% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITU or BTCZ?

BITU and BTCZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITU or BTCZ?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

What is the main difference between BITU and BTCZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.