PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITU vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITU vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -56.85% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's -1.73% return.


BITU

1D
1.18%
1M
7.02%
6M
-41.26%
YTD
-56.85%
1Y
-77.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-33.51%

BITC

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.28%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-1.73%
1Y
-24.61%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$49.56K$67.09K$86.92K
$36.32M$38.70M$45.83M

BITU vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-56.85%-37.07%41.85%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-1.73%-20.46%30.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BITU and BITC is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between BITU and BITC has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITU vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BITU vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITUBITCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.80

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.89

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.18

-0.12

BITU vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITU Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITU and BITC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITU vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -83.45%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITUBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.45%

-38.51%

-44.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.45%

-27.89%

-55.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.70%

-32.46%

-48.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.76%

-17.02%

-20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.73%

20.86%

+38.87%

Volatility

BITU vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 16.04% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 8.07%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITUBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.04%

8.07%

+7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.33%

18.32%

+48.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.24%

25.11%

+63.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.93%

45.76%

+50.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.93%

45.76%

+50.17%

BITU vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITU vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.54%, more than BITC's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.42%3.36%42.68%5.82%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
79.54%50.23%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITU and BITC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (16.04%) compared to BITC (8.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -83.45% vs BITC's -38.51%.

On 1-year performance, BITC leads with -24.61% vs -77.91% for BITU. On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 8.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITC has performed better with a -24.61% return vs -77.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 79.54%, compared with 3.42% for BITC.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITU and 0.88% for BITC.

BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITU and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer