PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITS vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 41.32% return.


BITS

1D
-2.94%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
4.17%
6M
-6.53%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
49.59%
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
4.17%14.90%61.84%212.23%-75.46%-29.31%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
41.32%446.78%96.92%65.91%-86.30%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and ZCSH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSZCSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

6.10

-5.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

4.11

-3.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.48

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

14.55

-14.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.75

28.49

-27.74

BITS vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the ZCSH Sharpe Ratio of 6.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and ZCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

6.10

-5.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.10

-0.08

Drawdowns

BITS vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-93.73%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-69.62%

+21.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.38%

-71.90%

+23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.42%

-15.71%

-15.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-74.41%

+31.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.68%

35.49%

-9.81%

Volatility

BITS vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) is 12.83%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 48.45%. This indicates that BITS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITSZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

48.45%

-35.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.38%

94.06%

-53.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.55%

166.02%

-113.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.91%

136.87%

-75.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.91%

136.87%

-75.96%

BITS vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITS vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.88%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
21.88%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITS and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZCSH has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to BITS (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.

On 3-year performance, ZCSH leads with 185.96% vs 49.59% for BITS. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITS has been the lower-risk option at 12.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 185.96% return vs 49.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.88%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

BITS tracks NONE, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 2.50% for ZCSH.

ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITS and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer