PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. EZPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITS vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITS vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-17.84%11.24%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-23.94%-10.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -17.84% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -23.94% return.


BITS

1D
4.79%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-17.84%
6M
-35.16%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
40.54%
5Y*
10Y*

EZPZ

1D
2.11%
1M
3.63%
YTD
-23.94%
6M
-43.46%
1Y
-16.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITS vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSEZPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

-0.33

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

-0.16

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.98

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

-0.33

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.97

-0.71

+1.68

BITS vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and EZPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSEZPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

-0.33

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

-0.59

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and EZPZ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BITS vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.75%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
27.75%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BITS vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and EZPZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSEZPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-52.38%

-30.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-52.38%

+4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.91%

-48.71%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-18.25%

-24.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.91%

24.42%

-2.51%

Volatility

BITS vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 17.70% compared to Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) at 14.00%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITSEZPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.70%

14.00%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.68%

39.76%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.59%

48.54%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.52%

49.47%

+12.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.52%

49.47%

+12.05%