BITS vs. BTCZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ).

BITS and BTCZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BITS is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Nov 15, 2021. BTCZ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Jul 9, 2024.

Performance

BITS vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITS vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-17.29%	14.90%	29.56%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	28.74%	-29.11%	-76.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 28.74% return.

BITS

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -7.35%
• YTD: -17.29%
• 6M: -36.24%
• 1Y: 20.57%
• 3Y*: 40.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 6M: 102.65%
• 1Y: -11.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

BTCZ

T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF

BITS

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

BITS vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 24
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 12
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITS	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	-0.13	+0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	0.45	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.05	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	-0.26	+0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.16	-0.36	+1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITS vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and BTCZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITS	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	-0.13	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	-0.60	+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and BTCZ is -0.88. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

BITS vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.56%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	27.56%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BITS vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITS	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.11%	-91.06%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.38%	-68.27%	+19.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.55%	-79.24%	+33.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.20%	-72.75%	+29.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.10%	48.60%	-26.50%

Volatility

BITS vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) is 17.37%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 26.38%. This indicates that BITS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITS	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.37%	26.38%	-9.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.69%	73.37%	-29.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.51%	90.72%	-36.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.49%	99.57%	-38.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.49%	99.57%	-38.08%