PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITS vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITS vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-17.29%14.90%62.06%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
-22.13%-6.56%99.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -22.13% return.


BITS

1D
0.67%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
-17.29%
6M
-36.24%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
40.85%
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-22.13%
6M
-42.09%
1Y
-20.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITS vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

-0.44

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

-0.37

+1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.96

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

-0.36

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.16

-0.75

+1.91

BITS vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

-0.44

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.36

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and FBTC is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BITS vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.56%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
27.56%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BITS vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and FBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-49.33%

-33.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-49.33%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.55%

-45.76%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-14.18%

-29.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.10%

23.23%

-1.13%

Volatility

BITS vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 17.37% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) at 12.91%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITSFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.37%

12.91%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.69%

36.78%

+6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.51%

45.27%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.49%

51.16%

+10.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.49%

51.16%

+10.33%