BITS vs. BOTZ
BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITS is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the NONE, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITS returned 49.59%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
BITS vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 11.15% return.
BITS
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- -6.53%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 49.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 29.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
BITS vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 4.17% | 14.90% | 61.84% | 212.23% | -75.46% | -29.31% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 11.15% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | -5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITS and BOTZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BITS and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
BITS vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BITS
BOTZ
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BITS
BOTZ
Technology
BITS
BOTZ
Basic Materials
BITS
-
BOTZ
Communication Services
BITS
-
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
BITS
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
BITS
-
BOTZ
Energy
BITS
-
BOTZ
Healthcare
BITS
-
BOTZ
Industrials
BITS
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
BITS
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
BITS
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITS vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
BITS
BOTZ
BITS vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.24 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 1.87 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.53 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | 5.26 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.24 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.44 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
BITS vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.11% | -55.54% | -27.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.38% | -19.34% | -29.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.38% | -29.02% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.42% | -3.27% | -28.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -18.32% | -24.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.68% | 5.63% | +20.05% |
Volatility
BITS vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.77%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.83% | 7.77% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.38% | 18.40% | +21.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.55% | 23.98% | +28.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.91% | 26.73% | +34.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.91% | 25.73% | +35.18% |
BITS vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITS vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.88%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 21.88% | 22.80% | 29.49% | 13.69% | 0.48% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITS and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to BOTZ (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 3-year performance, BITS leads with 49.59% vs 12.97% for BOTZ. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITS has performed better with a 49.59% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.88%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.
BITS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BOTZ is Robotics. BITS tracks NONE, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITS and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer