BITQ vs. QSOL
BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
BITQ vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -36.90% return.
BITQ
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 18.26%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 31.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 16.20%
- 6M
- -45.49%
- YTD
- -36.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITQ vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 18.26% | -10.43% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -36.90% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITQ and QSOL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITQ vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
BITQ
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITQ vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITQ | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITQ vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than QSOL's maximum drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITQ | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -56.55% | -33.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.30% | -46.95% | +19.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.23% | -35.29% | -16.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.02% | — | — |
Volatility
BITQ vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITQ | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.13% | 71.97% | -14.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.31% | 71.97% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.04% | 71.97% | -4.93% |
BITQ vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITQ vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITQ and QSOL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.
BITQ is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for BITQ and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer