PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITQ vs. PXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITQ vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITQ vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
-5.92%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%
PXQ
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
5.86%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%28.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 5.86% return.


BITQ

1D
-0.58%
1M
-8.31%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-26.36%
1Y
47.29%
3Y*
48.40%
5Y*
10Y*

PXQ

1D
2.12%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
5.86%
6M
10.12%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
16.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITQ vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BITQ vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITQPXQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.79

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

2.50

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.26

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.74

15.18

-12.44

BITQ vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the PXQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and PXQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITQPXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.79

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.49

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and PXQ is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BITQ vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXQ
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
0.88%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than PXQ's maximum drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and PXQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITQPXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-57.18%

-33.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.99%

-12.94%

-32.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.16%

-4.97%

-37.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.86%

-10.82%

-43.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.87%

2.78%

+17.09%

Volatility

BITQ vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) at 8.36%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITQPXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.63%

8.36%

+9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.99%

15.60%

+30.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.97%

23.35%

+35.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.77%

22.87%

+44.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.77%

22.72%

+45.05%