BITQ vs. NUKZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ).

BITQ and NUKZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BITQ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. It was launched on May 11, 2021. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. Both BITQ and NUKZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	-5.92%	18.00%	108.75%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	5.84%	56.57%	62.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 5.84% return.

BITQ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -8.31%
• YTD: -5.92%
• 6M: -26.36%
• 1Y: 47.29%
• 3Y*: 48.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: -9.62%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 75.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITQ and NUKZ have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

BITQ

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF

NUKZ

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 42
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 93
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITQ	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.38	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	3.06	-1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.38	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	4.72	-3.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	12.40	-9.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and NUKZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITQ	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	2.38	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	1.78	-1.83

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and NUKZ is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.86%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-33.03%	-57.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	-16.51%	-28.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.16%	-9.62%	-32.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.86%	-6.10%	-47.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.87%	6.28%	+13.59%

Volatility

BITQ vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 9.47%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.63%	9.47%	+8.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.99%	21.64%	+24.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.97%	31.77%	+27.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.77%	32.60%	+35.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.77%	32.60%	+35.17%