BITQ vs. IAK
BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BITQ returned 0.93%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for IAK. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.
Performance
BITQ vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.11% return.
BITQ
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- 39.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37M | $2.10M | $2.97M | |
| $15.27M | $20.59M | $12.29M |
BITQ vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 18.16% | 18.00% | 46.97% | 246.83% | -83.86% | -11.98% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 10.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITQ and IAK is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between BITQ and IAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BITQ vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BITQ
IAK
Financial Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BITQ
IAK
Technology
BITQ
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
BITQ
IAK
-
Basic Materials
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Communication Services
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Energy
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Healthcare
BITQ
-
IAK
Industrials
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Real Estate
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Utilities
BITQ
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITQ vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
BITQ
IAK
BITQ vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITQ | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.59 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 6.29 | -5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITQ vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than IAK's maximum drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITQ | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -77.38% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.99% | -7.62% | -37.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.22% | -11.58% | -39.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.32% | -14.76% | -75.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.36% | -3.20% | -24.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.97% | -16.01% | -35.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | 3.13% | +19.30% |
Volatility
BITQ vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 19.86% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 6.56%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITQ | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.86% | 6.56% | +13.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.31% | 12.42% | +31.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.03% | 15.99% | +43.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.26% | 18.13% | +49.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.15% | 20.92% | +46.23% |
BITQ vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITQ vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.42% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITQ and IAK have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITQ has higher volatility (19.86%) compared to IAK (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 15.99% vs 0.93% for BITQ. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 15.99% return vs 0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.
BITQ is categorized as Blockchain, while IAK is Financials Equities. BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.38% for IAK.
IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITQ and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer