BITQ vs. HTUS
BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. BITQ is passively managed, while HTUS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BITQ returned 5.19%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for HTUS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
BITQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 39.79% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 11.33% return.
BITQ
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 39.79%
- 6M
- 21.39%
- 1Y
- 60.30%
- 3Y*
- 58.56%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
BITQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 39.79% | 18.00% | 46.97% | 246.83% | -83.86% | -7.06% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITQ and HTUS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between BITQ and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
BITQ vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BITQ
HTUS
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BITQ
HTUS
Technology
BITQ
HTUS
Consumer Cyclical
BITQ
HTUS
Basic Materials
BITQ
-
HTUS
Communication Services
BITQ
-
HTUS
Consumer Defensive
BITQ
-
HTUS
Energy
BITQ
-
HTUS
Healthcare
BITQ
-
HTUS
Industrials
BITQ
-
HTUS
Real Estate
BITQ
-
HTUS
Utilities
BITQ
-
HTUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
BITQ
HTUS
BITQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.50 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.35 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 17.27 | -14.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 2.53 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.81 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.58 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
BITQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than HTUS's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -47.50% | -42.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.99% | -8.68% | -36.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.22% | -24.41% | -26.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.32% | -24.41% | -65.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.06% | -0.55% | -13.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.80% | -4.06% | -48.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.32% | 1.68% | +19.64% |
Volatility
BITQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 2.47%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 2.47% | +12.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.74% | 9.39% | +33.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.05% | 11.50% | +44.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.17% | 19.03% | +48.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.23% | 21.45% | +45.78% |
BITQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITQ and HTUS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITQ has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to HTUS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.35% vs 5.19% for BITQ. On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.
BITQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITQ and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer