PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITQ vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
-5.37%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
-3.85%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%15.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's -3.85% return.


BITQ

1D
5.90%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-24.77%
1Y
55.35%
3Y*
48.69%
5Y*
10Y*

HTUS

1D
3.72%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
0.02%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BITQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITQHTUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.79

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.37

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.99

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.59

6.79

-4.20

BITQ vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and HTUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITQHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.79

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.51

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and HTUS is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BITQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
12.37%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than HTUS's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and HTUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITQHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-47.50%

-42.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.99%

-17.90%

-27.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.83%

-5.29%

-36.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.87%

-4.11%

-49.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.73%

2.61%

+17.12%

Volatility

BITQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 17.97% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 6.36%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITQHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.97%

6.36%

+11.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.99%

9.24%

+36.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.04%

21.90%

+37.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.79%

18.99%

+48.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.79%

21.38%

+46.41%