PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITQ vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 39.79% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 11.33% return.


BITQ

1D
-2.21%
1M
11.04%
YTD
39.79%
6M
21.39%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
58.56%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*

HTUS

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.04%
YTD
11.33%
6M
12.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
39.79%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
11.33%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and HTUS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.49

The correlation between BITQ and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITQ
HTUS

Financial Services

67.1%
11.8%

Technology

28.1%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

BITQ
67.1%
HTUS
11.8%

Technology

BITQ
28.1%
HTUS
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BITQ
4.8%
HTUS
10.1%

Basic Materials

BITQ

-

HTUS
1.8%

Communication Services

BITQ

-

HTUS
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

BITQ

-

HTUS
4.9%

Energy

BITQ

-

HTUS
3.5%

Healthcare

BITQ

-

HTUS
8.5%

Industrials

BITQ

-

HTUS
8.3%

Real Estate

BITQ

-

HTUS
1.9%

Utilities

BITQ

-

HTUS
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITQHTUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.50

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.35

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

17.27

-14.43

BITQ vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and HTUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITQHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.53

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.81

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.58

-0.51

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than HTUS's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and HTUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITQHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-47.50%

-42.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.99%

-8.68%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.22%

-24.41%

-26.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.32%

-24.41%

-65.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.06%

-0.55%

-13.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.80%

-4.06%

-48.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.32%

1.68%

+19.64%

Volatility

BITQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 2.47%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITQHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.73%

2.47%

+12.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.74%

9.39%

+33.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.05%

11.50%

+44.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.17%

19.03%

+48.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.23%

21.45%

+45.78%

BITQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.68%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITQ and HTUS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITQ has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to HTUS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs HTUS's -47.50%.

On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.35% vs 5.19% for BITQ. On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

BITQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITQ and HTUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer