PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITQ vs. GGME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITQ vs. GGME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than GGME's 2.98% return.


BITQ

1D
3.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
14.26%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
39.21%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.18%

GGME

1D
1.63%
1M
0.97%
6M
8.87%
YTD
2.98%
1Y
1.20%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.37M$2.10M$2.97M
$154.10K$130.09K$148.95K

BITQ vs. GGME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
18.16%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-11.98%
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
2.98%16.39%32.67%23.76%-36.43%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and GGME is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021

0.60

The correlation between BITQ and GGME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. GGME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITQ
GGME

Financial Services

77.6%
0.3%

Technology

19.2%
56.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

40.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BITQ
77.6%
GGME
0.3%

Technology

BITQ
19.2%
GGME
56.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BITQ
3.1%
GGME
3.1%

Basic Materials

BITQ

-

GGME

-

Communication Services

BITQ

-

GGME
40.3%

Consumer Defensive

BITQ

-

GGME

-

Energy

BITQ

-

GGME

-

Healthcare

BITQ

-

GGME

-

Industrials

BITQ

-

GGME
0.5%

Real Estate

BITQ

-

GGME

-

Utilities

BITQ

-

GGME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITQ vs. GGME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GGME
GGME Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGME Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BITQ vs. GGME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITQGGMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.03

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

0.05

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

0.10

+1.00

BITQ vs. GGME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the GGME Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and GGME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. GGME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than GGME's maximum drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and GGME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITQGGMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-69.13%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.99%

-25.23%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.22%

-25.23%

-25.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.32%

-44.72%

-45.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.36%

-6.94%

-20.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.97%

-14.49%

-37.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.43%

11.67%

+10.76%

Volatility

BITQ vs. GGME - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 19.86% compared to Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) at 4.77%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITQGGMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.86%

4.77%

+15.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.31%

16.28%

+28.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.03%

19.99%

+39.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.26%

24.34%

+42.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.15%

23.22%

+43.93%

BITQ vs. GGME - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GGME's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITQ vs. GGME - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
0.02%0.17%0.08%2.31%0.76%0.39%0.38%0.50%0.93%0.33%0.16%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITQ and GGME have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITQ has higher volatility (19.86%) compared to GGME (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs GGME's -69.13%.

On 5-year performance, GGME leads with 3.78% vs 0.93% for BITQ. On fees, GGME is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GGME has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GGME is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

GGME has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

BITQ is categorized as Blockchain, while GGME is Technology Equities. BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.60% for GGME.

BITQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITQ and GGME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer