GGME vs. VICE
GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VICE is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. GGME is passively managed, while VICE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGME returned 3.78%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for VICE. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for VICE.
Performance
GGME vs. VICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than VICE's 4.56% return.
GGME
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.56%
VICE
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- -4.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $154.10K | $130.09K | $148.95K | |
| $20.36K | $15.57K | $15.59K |
GGME vs. VICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 2.98% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 1.08% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 4.56% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 22.45% | 20.05% | -16.93% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGME and VICE is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GGME and VICE has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GGME vs. VICE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGME
VICE
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GGME
VICE
Communication Services
GGME
VICE
Consumer Cyclical
GGME
VICE
Industrials
GGME
VICE
-
Financial Services
GGME
VICE
-
Basic Materials
GGME
-
VICE
Consumer Defensive
GGME
-
VICE
Energy
GGME
-
VICE
-
Healthcare
GGME
-
VICE
-
Real Estate
GGME
-
VICE
Utilities
GGME
-
VICE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGME vs. VICE — Risk / Return Rank
GGME
VICE
GGME vs. VICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGME | VICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.96 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | -0.33 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | -0.54 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGME vs. VICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than VICE's maximum drawdown of -38.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and VICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGME | VICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -38.27% | -30.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -13.59% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -16.55% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.72% | -29.92% | -14.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -7.31% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -12.26% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.67% | 8.19% | +3.48% |
Volatility
GGME vs. VICE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) at 4.42%. This indicates that GGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGME | VICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.42% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 10.13% | +6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.99% | 13.82% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 17.57% | +6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 19.12% | +4.10% |
GGME vs. VICE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than VICE's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGME vs. VICE - Dividend Comparison
GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than VICE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGME and VICE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs VICE's -38.27%.
On 5-year performance, GGME leads with 3.78% vs 1.94% for VICE. On fees, GGME is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GGME has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GGME is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while VICE is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.99% for VICE.
GGME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGME and VICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer