PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITO vs. SLJY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITO vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -26.94% return, which is significantly lower than SLJY's -10.91% return.


BITO

1D
1.50%
1M
3.17%
6M
-33.00%
YTD
-26.94%
1Y
-46.65%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.51%

SLJY

1D
-0.25%
1M
-11.40%
6M
-23.95%
YTD
-10.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-26.94%-26.04%
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
-10.91%42.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and SLJY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITO vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SLJY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITOSLJYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

BITO vs. SLJY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITO vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than SLJY's maximum drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and SLJY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITOSLJYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.86%

-35.19%

-42.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.61%

-35.19%

-14.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-12.33%

-24.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.20%

Volatility

BITO vs. SLJY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITOSLJYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.13%

49.47%

-5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.76%

49.47%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.76%

49.47%

+5.29%

BITO vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITO vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.56%, more than SLJY's 22.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
59.56%78.29%61.59%15.14%
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
22.85%6.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITO and SLJY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLJY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLJY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 59.56%, compared with 22.85% for SLJY.

BITO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SLJY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 0.75% for SLJY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITO and SLJY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer