BITO vs. EZET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITO is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Over the past year, BITO returned -41.98% vs -32.57% for EZET. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

BITO vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -28.44% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -40.23% return.

BITO

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: -22.52%
• YTD: -28.44%
• 6M: -32.46%
• 1Y: -41.98%
• 3Y*: 26.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZET

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -25.14%
• YTD: -40.23%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-28.44%	-11.19%	37.75%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-40.23%	-11.23%	-3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and EZET is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	0.81

The correlation between BITO and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BITO vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITO	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	-0.48	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.39	-0.34	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.96	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.52	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	-0.86	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITO vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and EZET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITO	EZET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.97	-0.48	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	-0.42	+0.32

Drawdowns

BITO vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than EZET's maximum drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITO	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.86%	-64.05%	-13.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.64%	-63.36%	+12.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.64%	-63.36%	+12.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.75%	-32.74%	-4.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.27%	37.94%	-8.67%

Volatility

BITO vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) is 9.03%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that BITO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITO	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	9.68%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.71%	45.32%	-11.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.61%	68.34%	-24.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.10%	72.29%	-17.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.10%	72.29%	-17.19%

BITO vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITO vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.59%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	69.59%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITO and EZET in my portfolio?

BITO and EZET have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITO or EZET?

EZET has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to BITO (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs EZET's -64.05%.

Which ETF is better, BITO or EZET?

On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -32.57% vs -41.98% for BITO. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITO or EZET?

Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -32.57% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITO or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITO or EZET?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between BITO and EZET?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 0.19% for EZET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.