PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITO vs. BTRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITO vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -28.44% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.20% return.


BITO

1D
-2.81%
1M
-22.52%
YTD
-28.44%
6M
-32.46%
1Y
-41.98%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
10Y*

BTRN

1D
0.10%
1M
-13.54%
YTD
-9.20%
6M
-9.80%
1Y
-17.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-28.44%-11.19%34.70%
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
-9.20%4.89%5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and BTRN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.79

The correlation between BITO and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITO vs. BTRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITO
BTRN

Financial Services

68.5%
68.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BITO
68.5%
BTRN
68.6%

Basic Materials

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Communication Services

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Consumer Defensive

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Energy

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Healthcare

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Industrials

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Real Estate

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Technology

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Utilities

BITO

-

BTRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITO vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BTRN
BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITOBTRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.85

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.69

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

-1.17

-0.26

BITO vs. BTRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is comparable to the BTRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and BTRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITOBTRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

-0.88

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.00

-0.10

Drawdowns

BITO vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and BTRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITOBTRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.86%

-36.97%

-40.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.64%

-25.29%

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.64%

-25.22%

-25.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.75%

-14.43%

-22.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.27%

14.76%

+14.51%

Volatility

BITO vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.93%. This indicates that BITO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITOBTRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

6.93%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.71%

10.35%

+23.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

19.84%

+23.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.10%

30.94%

+24.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.10%

30.94%

+24.16%

BITO vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BITO and BTRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BITO vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.59%, more than BTRN's 30.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
69.59%78.29%61.59%15.14%
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
30.57%27.76%2.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITO and BTRN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITO has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to BTRN (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs BTRN's -36.97%.

On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -17.28% vs -41.98% for BITO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -17.28% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITO and BTRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.59%, compared with 30.57% for BTRN.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X.

BTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITO and BTRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer