BITC vs. EZPZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ).

BITC and EZPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BITC is an actively managed fund by Bitwise. It was launched on Mar 20, 2023. EZPZ is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. It was launched on Feb 20, 2025.

Performance

BITC vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITC vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF	-0.11%	-15.22%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-23.94%	-10.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -23.94% return.

BITC

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: -16.94%
• 1Y: -9.37%
• 3Y*: 30.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZPZ

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 3.63%
• YTD: -23.94%
• 6M: -43.46%
• 1Y: -16.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

BITC

Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF

EZPZ

Franklin Crypto Index ETF

Return for Risk

BITC vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC

BITC Risk / Return Rank: 6
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 7

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 7
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITC	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	-0.33	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.33	-0.16	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.98	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	-0.33	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.65	-0.71	+0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BITC vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is comparable to the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and EZPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITC	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	-0.33	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	-0.59	+1.24

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and EZPZ is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BITC vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF	3.37%	3.36%	42.68%	5.82%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BITC vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITC	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.51%	-52.38%	+13.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.51%	-52.38%	+25.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.35%	-48.71%	+17.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.79%	-18.25%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.45%	24.42%	-7.97%

Volatility

BITC vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) is 12.06%, while Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a volatility of 14.00%. This indicates that BITC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITC	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.06%	14.00%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.16%	39.76%	-20.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.70%	48.54%	-21.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.63%	49.47%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.63%	49.47%	-1.84%