PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.73% return.


BITC

1D
-2.97%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-1.00%
YTD
-1.76%
1Y
-24.54%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.54%

BTCI

1D
-2.39%
1M
2.51%
6M
-23.02%
YTD
-25.73%
1Y
-40.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.18K$64.98K$91.15K
$12.53M$12.80M$22.67M

BITC vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-1.76%-20.46%56.71%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-25.73%-1.09%26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and BTCI is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.60

The correlation between BITC and BTCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BITC vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITCBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.83

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.87

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-1.36

+0.17

BITC vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is comparable to the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITC vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITCBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-48.42%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.89%

-48.42%

+20.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.48%

-45.08%

+12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-17.81%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.72%

30.79%

-10.07%

Volatility

BITC vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 7.31%. This indicates that BITC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITCBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

7.31%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.32%

30.70%

-12.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.11%

40.00%

-14.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.81%

39.67%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.81%

39.67%

+6.14%

BITC vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITC vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BTCI's 41.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.42%3.36%42.68%5.82%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
41.26%36.46%6.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC and BTCI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITC has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to BTCI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITC dropped -38.51% vs BTCI's -48.42%.

On 1-year performance, BITC leads with -24.54% vs -40.21% for BTCI. On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITC has performed better with a -24.54% return vs -40.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 41.26%, compared with 3.42% for BITC.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for BITC and 0.99% for BTCI.

BITC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer