PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC vs. BCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITC vs. BCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITC vs. BCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-0.39%-20.46%97.86%42.29%
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
-22.45%-17.71%24.56%390.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than BCHG's -22.45% return.


BITC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
-9.45%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
10Y*

BCHG

1D
1.82%
1M
7.20%
YTD
-22.45%
6M
-29.00%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
57.96%
5Y*
-28.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC vs. BCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BCHG
BCHG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC vs. BCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITCBCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

0.55

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.33

1.36

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.15

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

0.67

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.58

1.54

-2.12

BITC vs. BCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the BCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and BCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITCBCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

0.55

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

-0.17

+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and BCHG is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BITC vs. BCHG - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while BCHG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.38%3.36%42.68%5.82%
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BITC vs. BCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum BCHG drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and BCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITCBCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-99.36%

+60.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-38.91%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.54%

-94.05%

+62.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-86.24%

+70.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.53%

17.04%

-0.51%

Volatility

BITC vs. BCHG - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) at 11.12%. This indicates that BITC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITCBCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.07%

11.12%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.16%

52.62%

-33.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.66%

76.91%

-50.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.60%

113.16%

-65.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.60%

133.77%

-86.17%