PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC vs. BCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC vs. BCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than BCHG's -58.88% return.


BITC

1D
-0.00%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
6.98%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
-15.09%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
10Y*

BCHG

1D
-11.79%
1M
-42.88%
YTD
-58.88%
6M
-61.63%
1Y
-42.88%
3Y*
27.85%
5Y*
-38.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC vs. BCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
6.98%-20.46%97.86%42.29%
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
-58.88%-17.71%24.56%390.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and BCHG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC vs. BCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BCHG
BCHG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC vs. BCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITCBCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.59

-0.62

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.71

-0.67

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.93

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.67

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.82

-1.77

+0.95

BITC vs. BCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is comparable to the BCHG Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and BCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITCBCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

-0.62

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

-0.23

+0.90

Drawdowns

BITC vs. BCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum BCHG drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and BCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITCBCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-99.36%

+60.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-64.18%

+37.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

-91.79%

+53.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.48%

-96.84%

+70.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-86.50%

+70.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.37%

24.21%

-5.84%

Volatility

BITC vs. BCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) is 6.39%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) has a volatility of 21.32%. This indicates that BITC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITCBCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

21.32%

-14.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.98%

49.29%

-29.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.54%

69.91%

-44.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.65%

108.72%

-62.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.65%

132.16%

-85.51%

Dividends

BITC vs. BCHG - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, while BCHG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.14%3.36%42.68%5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC and BCHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCHG has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to BITC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITC dropped -38.51% vs BCHG's -99.36%.

BITC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC and BCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer