BCHG vs. BITO
BCHG (Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust) is a stock, while BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Over the past 3 years, BCHG returned 27.85%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for BITO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BCHG vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCHG achieves a -58.88% return, which is significantly lower than BITO's -26.37% return.
BCHG
- 1D
- -11.79%
- 1M
- -42.88%
- YTD
- -58.88%
- 6M
- -61.63%
- 1Y
- -42.88%
- 3Y*
- 27.85%
- 5Y*
- -38.75%
- 10Y*
- —
BITO
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -26.37%
- 6M
- -30.81%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCHG vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHG Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust | -58.88% | -17.71% | 24.56% | 1,039.19% | -87.55% | -37.19% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.37% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHG and BITO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between BCHG and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCHG vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
BCHG
BITO
BCHG vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.85 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.82 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | -1.41 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | -0.95 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.09 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
BCHG vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHG drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHG and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -77.86% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.18% | -50.05% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.79% | -50.05% | -41.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.84% | -49.22% | -47.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -36.73% | -49.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.21% | 29.09% | -4.88% |
Volatility
BCHG vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 9.43%. This indicates that BCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.32% | 9.43% | +11.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.29% | 34.26% | +15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.91% | 43.57% | +26.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.72% | 55.11% | +53.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.16% | 55.11% | +77.05% |
Dividends
BCHG vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
BCHG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHG Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 67.63% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCHG and BITO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCHG has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to BITO (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHG dropped -99.36% vs BITO's -77.86%.
BCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCHG and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer