PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHG vs. INDEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCHG vs. INDEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) and Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCHG vs. INDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
-22.45%-17.71%24.56%1,039.19%-87.55%-87.96%80.81%
INDEX
Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight
-7.15%17.77%24.73%10.58%-11.84%29.10%16.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHG achieves a -22.45% return, which is significantly lower than INDEX's -7.15% return.


BCHG

1D
1.82%
1M
3.08%
YTD
-22.45%
6M
-24.72%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
57.96%
5Y*
-28.89%
10Y*

INDEX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-7.15%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCHG vs. INDEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHG
BCHG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

INDEX
INDEX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
INDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
INDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHG vs. INDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) and Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCHGINDEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.05

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.54

5.10

-3.57

BCHG vs. INDEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the INDEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHG and INDEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCHGINDEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.55

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.54

-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between BCHG and INDEX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BCHG vs. INDEX - Dividend Comparison

BCHG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCHG
Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INDEX
Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight
1.12%1.04%1.97%1.56%3.25%1.81%1.53%1.61%3.09%1.15%

Drawdowns

BCHG vs. INDEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHG drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than INDEX's maximum drawdown of -38.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHG and INDEX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHGINDEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-38.82%

-60.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.91%

-12.10%

-26.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.30%

-21.52%

-77.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.05%

-8.93%

-85.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-4.69%

-81.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.04%

2.49%

+14.55%

Volatility

BCHG vs. INDEX - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Cash Trust (BCHG) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX) at 4.25%. This indicates that BCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCHGINDEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.12%

4.25%

+6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.62%

9.02%

+43.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.91%

18.09%

+58.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.16%

16.71%

+96.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.77%

18.62%

+115.15%