PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC.AS achieves a -27.10% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.


BITC.AS

1D
-3.60%
1M
-21.05%
YTD
-27.10%
6M
-31.00%
1Y
-40.51%
3Y*
29.34%
5Y*
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
8.32%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.54%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITC.AS
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP
-27.10%-17.17%136.40%79.86%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
17.82%18.16%24.07%39.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC.AS and NQSE.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023

0.32

The correlation between BITC.AS and NQSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC.AS
BITC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITC.ASNQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.39

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

3.08

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

10.77

-12.19

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC.AS and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITC.ASNQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

2.28

-3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.82

-0.11

Drawdowns

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC.AS drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, which is greater than NQSE.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC.AS and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITC.ASNQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-37.67%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-11.87%

-37.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.38%

-22.40%

-26.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.60%

-0.84%

-47.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-8.56%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.31%

3.40%

+24.91%

Volatility

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that BITC.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITC.ASNQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

4.75%

+4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.08%

11.99%

+17.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.42%

16.05%

+23.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.64%

20.91%

+24.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.64%

21.54%

+24.10%

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITC.AS vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITC.AS nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC.AS and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BITC.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BITC.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

BITC.AS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BITC.AS and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC.AS and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer