BITB vs. ZCSH
BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITB returned -39.79% vs 725.30% for ZCSH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITB charges 0.20%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
BITB vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITB achieves a -28.85% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's -12.85% return.
BITB
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- -17.74%
- YTD
- -28.85%
- 6M
- -28.92%
- 1Y
- -39.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- -6.64%
- 1M
- -41.90%
- YTD
- -12.85%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 725.30%
- 3Y*
- 137.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITB vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | -28.85% | -6.47% | 89.74% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | -12.85% | 446.78% | 139.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITB and ZCSH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITB vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
BITB
ZCSH
BITB vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITB | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.43 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 10.52 | -11.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 19.90 | -21.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITB vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITB | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.04% | -93.73% | +41.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.04% | -69.62% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.43% | -48.02% | -2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.85% | -74.01% | +57.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.56% | 36.72% | -6.16% |
Volatility
BITB vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) is 13.08%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 64.75%. This indicates that BITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITB | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 64.75% | -51.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.58% | 107.29% | -72.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.20% | 174.37% | -130.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.00% | 138.34% | -88.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.00% | 138.34% | -88.34% |
BITB vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITB vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
Neither BITB nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BITB and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCSH has higher volatility (64.75%) compared to BITB (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITB dropped -52.04% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.
On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 725.30% vs -39.79% for BITB. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 13.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 725.30% return vs -39.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
BITB and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BITB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: Bitwise Asset Management and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BITB and 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITB and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer