BISAX vs. CVISX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX).
BISAX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2012. CVISX is managed by Causeway. It was launched on Oct 19, 2014.
Performance
BISAX vs. CVISX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BISAX vs. CVISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | -3.38% | 45.50% | 23.18% | 39.03% | -8.68% | 18.39% | 4.62% | 6.80% | -20.13% | 11.52% |
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund | 4.10% | 32.93% | 9.71% | 26.74% | -11.51% | 21.30% | 2.48% | 18.55% | -21.34% | 34.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BISAX achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly lower than CVISX's 4.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BISAX having a 10.46% annualized return and CVISX not far ahead at 10.79%.
BISAX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -10.63%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
CVISX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BISAX vs. CVISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BISAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CVISX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BISAX vs. CVISX — Risk / Return Rank
BISAX
CVISX
BISAX vs. CVISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BISAX | CVISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 2.23 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 2.74 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.70 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 10.15 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BISAX | CVISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.23 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.34 | 0.82 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.65 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.60 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between BISAX and CVISX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BISAX vs. CVISX - Dividend Comparison
BISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than CVISX's 15.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | 3.34% | 3.23% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 3.88% | 8.33% | 4.00% | 3.44% |
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund | 15.91% | 16.56% | 10.60% | 6.14% | 2.75% | 3.48% | 3.42% | 3.57% | 2.91% | 8.23% | 2.78% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
BISAX vs. CVISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BISAX drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CVISX drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISAX and CVISX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BISAX | CVISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.30% | -48.50% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -10.77% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.44% | -25.20% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | -48.50% | +1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -10.77% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -8.99% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.17% | -0.23% |
Volatility
BISAX vs. CVISX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) is 5.26%, while Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that BISAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BISAX | CVISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 6.46% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 10.96% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 15.35% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 16.01% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 16.75% | -2.56% |