PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIS vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIS vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIS achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BIS has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -23.34%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


BIS

1D
-3.65%
1M
2.35%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
-49.58%
3Y*
-21.43%
5Y*
-14.49%
10Y*
-23.34%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIS vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIS
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology
-6.36%-45.95%4.79%-6.54%-2.14%-14.74%-56.01%-41.01%5.14%-36.98%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BIS and TQQQ is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2010

-0.61

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BIS and TQQQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.61 to -0.41, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIS vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIS
BIS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIS vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BISTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.40

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

3.75

-4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

12.27

-13.52

BIS vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIS and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BISTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

2.92

-4.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.43

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.50

0.69

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.74

-1.41

Drawdowns

BIS vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIS drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIS and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BISTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.87%

-81.66%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.50%

-36.97%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.87%

-58.04%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.80%

-81.66%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.25%

-81.66%

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.85%

-0.76%

-99.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.03%

-18.52%

-71.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.59%

11.28%

+28.31%

Volatility

BIS vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) have volatilities of 13.87% and 13.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BISTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.87%

13.29%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.95%

36.04%

-5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.68%

47.60%

-7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.74%

66.53%

-22.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.36%

65.96%

-19.60%

BIS vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BIS and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BIS vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIS
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology
4.92%5.25%3.73%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.45%2.11%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIS and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIS has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIS dropped -99.87% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -23.34% for BIS. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIS and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BIS has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIS and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer