BIS vs. BRKL
BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BIS is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BIS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
BIS vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BIS
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- 6M
- -20.75%
- YTD
- -24.85%
- 1Y
- -53.59%
- 3Y*
- -27.87%
- 5Y*
- -15.63%
- 10Y*
- -24.02%
- ALL TIME*
- -32.48%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.10K | $102.51K | $113.13K | |
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K |
BIS vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 9.15% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIS and BRKL is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIS vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
BIS
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIS vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIS | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIS vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIS drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIS and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIS | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -7.03% | -92.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.88% | -0.13% | -99.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.11% | -4.14% | -85.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.26% | — | — |
Volatility
BIS vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIS | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.71% | 30.99% | +9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.93% | 30.99% | +12.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 30.99% | +15.16% |
BIS vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIS vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
BIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 5.61% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIS and BRKL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.
BIS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BIS and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for BIS and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer