BIRK vs. GSK
BIRK (Birkenstock Holding plc) and GSK (GlaxoSmithKline plc) are both stocks. BIRK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while GSK operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past year, BIRK returned -8.93% vs 29.34% for GSK. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BIRK vs. GSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIRK achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly higher than GSK's 9.89% return.
BIRK
- 1D
- 5.50%
- 1M
- 47.41%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- -8.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
BIRK vs. GSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc | 19.19% | -27.82% | 16.27% | 18.85% |
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc | 9.89% | 51.23% | -5.14% | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIRK and GSK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
BIRK:
$8.97B
GSK:
$108.04B
BIRK:
€1.93
GSK:
£2.85
BIRK:
21.88
GSK:
13.90
BIRK:
0.28
GSK:
0.93
BIRK:
3.56
GSK:
2.47
BIRK:
2.68
GSK:
3.42
BIRK:
€2.19B
GSK:
£32.78B
BIRK:
€1.23B
GSK:
£23.87B
BIRK:
€671.99M
GSK:
£11.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIRK vs. GSK — Risk / Return Rank
BIRK
GSK
BIRK vs. GSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIRK | GSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.58 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 3.92 | -4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIRK vs. GSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIRK drawdown since its inception was -50.94%, smaller than the maximum GSK drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIRK and GSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIRK | GSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.94% | -55.70% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.59% | -18.63% | -22.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.31% | -11.92% | -11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -18.87% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.79% | 8.28% | +13.51% |
Volatility
BIRK vs. GSK - Volatility Comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) has a higher volatility of 23.33% compared to GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) at 6.81%. This indicates that BIRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIRK | GSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.33% | 6.81% | +16.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.05% | 18.49% | +23.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.51% | 27.06% | +20.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.51% | 25.08% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.51% | 22.89% | +20.62% |
Dividends
BIRK vs. GSK - Dividend Comparison
BIRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc | 3.26% | 3.42% | 4.60% | 3.75% | 5.47% | 4.99% | 5.59% | 4.35% | 5.65% | 5.83% | 6.86% | 5.93% |
Financials
BIRK vs. GSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Birkenstock Holding plc and GlaxoSmithKline plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BIRK vs. GSK - Profitability Comparison
BIRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Birkenstock Holding plc reported a gross profit of 315.59M and revenue of 628.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.
GSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.
BIRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Birkenstock Holding plc reported an operating income of 164.94M and revenue of 628.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
GSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.
BIRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Birkenstock Holding plc reported a net income of 83.23M and revenue of 628.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
GSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIRK and GSK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIRK has higher volatility (23.33%) compared to GSK (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIRK dropped -50.94% vs GSK's -55.70%.
GSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIRK and GSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer