BIRK vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
BIRK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIRK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc | -12.69% | -27.82% | 16.27% | 21.22% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 8.84% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 16.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIRK achieves a -12.69% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.84% return.
BIRK
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- YTD
- -12.69%
- 6M
- -22.74%
- 1Y
- -22.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 85.04%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 31.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIRK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
BIRK
SMH
BIRK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIRK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | 2.32 | -2.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | 2.92 | -3.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.41 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 5.39 | -5.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 19.22 | -20.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIRK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 2.32 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.28 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIRK and SMH is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BIRK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
BIRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
BIRK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIRK drawdown since its inception was -47.55%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIRK and SMH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIRK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.55% | -84.96% | +37.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.22% | -15.95% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.83% | -8.02% | -35.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -41.35% | +22.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.80% | 4.47% | +18.33% |
Volatility
BIRK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) has a higher volatility of 14.39% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.74%. This indicates that BIRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIRK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.39% | 11.74% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.86% | 24.02% | +5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.64% | 36.88% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.03% | 34.68% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.03% | 32.29% | +7.74% |