BIRK vs. CROX
BIRK (Birkenstock Holding plc) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Footwear & Accessories industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past year, BIRK returned -22.98% vs 22.74% for CROX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BIRK vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIRK achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 42.10% return.
BIRK
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 14.89%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- -22.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CROX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 18.05%
- YTD
- 42.10%
- 6M
- 37.72%
- 1Y
- 22.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 28.02%
BIRK vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc | 5.11% | -27.82% | 16.27% | 21.22% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 42.10% | -21.92% | 17.26% | 7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIRK and CROX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
BIRK:
$7.91B
CROX:
$6.16B
BIRK:
$1.93
CROX:
-$1.94
BIRK:
3.64
CROX:
1.61
BIRK:
2.73
CROX:
4.32
BIRK:
$2.19B
CROX:
$4.02B
BIRK:
$1.23B
CROX:
$2.34B
BIRK:
$671.99M
CROX:
$297.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIRK vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
BIRK
CROX
BIRK vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIRK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.14 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.70 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.19 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIRK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 0.44 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.17 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BIRK vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIRK drawdown since its inception was -50.94%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIRK and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIRK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.94% | -98.74% | +47.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.40% | -32.54% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -54.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.37% | -32.70% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -61.29% | +41.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.80% | 19.17% | +5.63% |
Volatility
BIRK vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) has a higher volatility of 27.68% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 11.14%. This indicates that BIRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIRK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.68% | 11.14% | +16.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.54% | 32.09% | +9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.78% | 52.49% | -5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.34% | 55.12% | -11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.34% | 55.94% | -12.60% |
Dividends
BIRK vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
Neither BIRK nor CROX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BIRK vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Birkenstock Holding plc and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BIRK vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
BIRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Birkenstock Holding plc reported a gross profit of 315.59M and revenue of 628.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
BIRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Birkenstock Holding plc reported an operating income of 164.94M and revenue of 628.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
BIRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Birkenstock Holding plc reported a net income of 83.23M and revenue of 628.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIRK and CROX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIRK has higher volatility (27.68%) compared to CROX (11.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIRK dropped -50.94% vs CROX's -98.74%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIRK and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer