BINV vs. IFLO
BINV (Brandes International ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, BINV returned 22.23% vs 32.28% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BINV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
BINV vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINV achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
BINV
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 5.84%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINV vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BINV Brandes International ETF | 5.75% | 15.58% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINV and IFLO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.81 |
BINV vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BINV
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
BINV
IFLO
Healthcare
BINV
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
BINV
IFLO
Industrials
BINV
IFLO
Technology
BINV
IFLO
Financial Services
BINV
IFLO
Communication Services
BINV
IFLO
Basic Materials
BINV
IFLO
Energy
BINV
IFLO
Real Estate
BINV
IFLO
Utilities
BINV
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINV vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
BINV
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BINV vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International ETF (BINV) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BINV | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BINV vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINV drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINV and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINV | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -6.44% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -6.44% | -5.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.04% | -3.37% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -1.25% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | — | — |
Volatility
BINV vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINV | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 14.75% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.75% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.75% | -0.02% |
BINV vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINV vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
BINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINV Brandes International ETF | 2.07% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 0.28% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINV and IFLO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 22.23% for BINV. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BINV.
BINV has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Brandes and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BINV and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for BINV and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer