PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINT vs. SHEH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINT vs. SHEH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than SHEH's 25.14% return.


BINT

1D
0.72%
1M
0.16%
6M
8.18%
YTD
14.01%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.03%

SHEH

1D
-0.63%
1M
15.58%
6M
23.06%
YTD
25.14%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$862.27K$966.71K$1.78M
$782.03K$668.74K$325.26K

BINT vs. SHEH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
14.01%14.43%
SHEH
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF
25.14%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and SHEH is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

-0.05

BINT vs. SHEH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BINT
SHEH

Technology

28.7%

-

Financial Services

18.5%

-

Industrials

13.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%

-

Healthcare

7.3%

-

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Basic Materials

5.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

3.9%
96.5%

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Technology

BINT
28.7%
SHEH

-

Financial Services

BINT
18.5%
SHEH

-

Industrials

BINT
13.0%
SHEH

-

Consumer Cyclical

BINT
8.2%
SHEH

-

Healthcare

BINT
7.3%
SHEH

-

Communication Services

BINT
5.9%
SHEH

-

Basic Materials

BINT
5.2%
SHEH

-

Consumer Defensive

BINT
4.7%
SHEH

-

Energy

BINT
3.9%
SHEH
96.5%

Utilities

BINT
2.6%
SHEH

-

Real Estate

BINT
2.1%
SHEH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINT vs. SHEH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINT
BINT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SHEH
SHEH Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SHEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINT vs. SHEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BINTSHEHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.59

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

4.35

+5.60

BINT vs. SHEH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SHEH Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and SHEH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BINT vs. SHEH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum SHEH drawdown of -17.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and SHEH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINTSHEHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-17.53%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-17.53%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-3.52%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-4.14%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

6.41%

-3.58%

Volatility

BINT vs. SHEH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) is 5.24%, while Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that BINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHEH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINTSHEHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.85%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

17.33%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

21.00%

-4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

20.53%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

20.53%

-4.70%

BINT vs. SHEH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SHEH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BINT vs. SHEH - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than SHEH's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
1.75%1.08%
SHEH
Shell plc ADRhedged ETF
1.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINT and SHEH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHEH has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to BINT (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs SHEH's -17.53%.

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 28.06% vs 27.83% for SHEH. On fees, SHEH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 28.06% return vs 27.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHEH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BINT.

SHEH has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.75% for BINT.

BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while SHEH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.19% for SHEH.

BINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINT and SHEH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer