BINT vs. KLMT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, BINT returned 27.48% vs 23.15% for KLMT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for KLMT.

Performance

BINT vs. KLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than KLMT's 10.09% return.

BINT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 13.21%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLMT

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 10.09%
• 6M: 9.12%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. KLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	13.21%	14.43%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	10.09%	14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and KLMT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.94

The correlation between BINT and KLMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BINT vs. KLMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINT	KLMT
Technology	27.6%	33.8%
Financial Services	18.1%	16.2%
Industrials	13.4%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.0%
Healthcare	7.2%	7.5%
Communication Services	6.2%	8.6%
Basic Materials	5.5%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.7%
Energy	4.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.6%	1.8%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.6%

Return for Risk

BINT vs. KLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 61
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 60
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. KLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.75	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.43	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.44	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	10.30	-0.02

BINT vs. KLMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the KLMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and KLMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINT vs. KLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum KLMT drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and KLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	KLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-16.87%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-9.54%	-1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-2.50%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-1.91%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.25%	+0.43%

Volatility

BINT vs. KLMT - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) at 5.41%. This indicates that BINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINT	KLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	5.41%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	11.08%	+2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	13.38%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	16.02%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	16.02%	-0.29%

BINT vs. KLMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BINT vs. KLMT - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than KLMT's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.01%	1.08%	0.00%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	1.79%	1.95%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and KLMT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, BINT and KLMT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BINT or KLMT?

BINT has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to KLMT (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs KLMT's -16.87%.

Which ETF is better, BINT or KLMT?

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 27.48% vs 23.15% for KLMT. On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, KLMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINT or KLMT?

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 27.48% return vs 23.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or KLMT?

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.01% for BINT.

What is the main difference between BINT and KLMT?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.10% for KLMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.