BINT vs. BOAT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while BOAT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Shipping Index. BINT is actively managed, while BOAT is passively managed. Over the past year, BINT returned 28.06% vs 59.66% for BOAT. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BOAT.

Performance

BINT vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 45.07% return.

BINT

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 8.18%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.03%

BOAT

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 13.47%
• 6M: 27.28%
• YTD: 45.07%
• 1Y: 59.66%
• 3Y*: 26.95%
• 5Y*: 25.20%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	$862.27K	$966.71K	$1.78M
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	$1.71M	$1.08M	$1.06M

BINT vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	14.01%	14.43%
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	45.07%	12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and BOAT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.37

BINT vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINT	BOAT
Technology	28.7%	-
Financial Services	18.5%	6.6%
Industrials	13.0%	29.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	-
Healthcare	7.3%	-
Communication Services	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	5.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.9%	10.3%
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

BINT vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 69
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BOAT

BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 93
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINT vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	BOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.90	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.75	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.46	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	5.17	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	14.58	-4.63

BINT vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINT vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum BOAT drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	BOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-33.94%	+23.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-11.60%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-0.54%	-1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-9.51%	+7.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	4.10%	-1.27%

Volatility

BINT vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) is 5.24%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that BINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINT	BOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	6.64%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	16.86%	-2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	20.72%	-4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	25.06%	-9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	25.06%	-9.23%

BINT vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BOAT's 6.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.75%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	6.34%	8.08%	13.89%	13.65%	13.57%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and BOAT in my portfolio?

BINT and BOAT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINT or BOAT?

BOAT has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to BINT (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

Which ETF is better, BINT or BOAT?

On 1-year performance, BOAT leads with 59.66% vs 28.06% for BINT. On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINT or BOAT?

Over the 1-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 59.66% return vs 28.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or BOAT?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BOAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or BOAT?

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 1.75% for BINT.

What is the main difference between BINT and BOAT?

BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.69% for BOAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.