BINC vs. TLT
BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. BINC is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BINC returned 6.67%/yr vs -1.80%/yr for TLT. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BINC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
BINC vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return.
BINC
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70.16M | $76.44M | $122.66M | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
BINC vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.11% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -3.49% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINC and TLT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between BINC and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINC vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
BINC
TLT
BINC vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BINC | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.99 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | -0.14 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | -0.30 | +6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BINC vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINC | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -48.35% | +45.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -7.74% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.69% | -14.79% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -42.36% | +41.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -13.99% | +13.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 3.57% | -2.87% |
Volatility
BINC vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) is 0.78%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that BINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINC | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 2.46% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 6.85% | -4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 9.32% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 15.74% | -12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 14.83% | -11.86% |
BINC vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINC vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.42% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINC and TLT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to BINC (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINC dropped -2.69% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 3-year performance, BINC leads with 6.67% vs -1.80% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BINC has performed better with a 6.67% return vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BINC.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 4.34% for TLT.
BINC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.15% for TLT.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BINC and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer