BINC vs. MANI
BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) and MANI (Man Active Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BINC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MANI.
Performance
BINC vs. MANI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than MANI's 4.94% return.
BINC
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
MANI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70.16M | $76.44M | $122.66M | |
| $12.79K | $28.11K | $69.51K |
BINC vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.11% | 1.19% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.94% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINC and MANI is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINC vs. MANI — Risk / Return Rank
BINC
MANI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BINC vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BINC | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BINC vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and MANI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINC | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -0.74% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -0.10% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | — | — |
Volatility
BINC vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINC | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 1.96% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 1.96% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 1.96% | +1.01% |
BINC vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINC vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison
BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than MANI's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.42% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.65% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINC and MANI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 4.65% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.85% for MANI.
Find the right allocation for BINC and MANI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer