PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMBX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMBX achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMBX has underperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 4.47%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.


BIMBX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
0.61%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
4.47%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I
-0.77%5.00%6.83%6.43%-2.95%6.18%3.57%8.43%1.83%9.89%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMBX and MHELX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.09

The correlation between BIMBX and MHELX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMBX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMBX
BIMBX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BIMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIMBXMHELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

2.06

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.41

2.92

-2.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.39

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

4.64

-4.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.59

15.69

-15.11

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMBX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIMBXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

2.06

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.24

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.25

0.43

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.33

+1.02

Drawdowns

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMBX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMBXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-61.24%

+52.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-8.52%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

-30.81%

+25.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.50%

-32.01%

+25.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.73%

-39.02%

+30.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-0.60%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-12.93%

+11.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.51%

-0.65%

Volatility

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) is 1.18%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that BIMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMBXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

4.53%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

15.24%

-11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

19.23%

-15.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

21.00%

-17.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

20.97%

-17.39%

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMBX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMBX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

BIMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I
2.29%2.27%4.07%4.48%4.99%2.62%1.31%3.90%8.93%4.08%5.00%0.00%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIMBX and MHELX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to BIMBX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMBX dropped -8.73% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMBX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer