BIMBX vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
BIMBX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 19, 2015. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
BIMBX vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMBX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I | 1.16% | 5.00% | 6.83% | 6.43% | -2.95% | 6.18% | 3.57% | 8.43% | 1.83% | 9.89% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.09% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMBX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMBX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 4.72%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
BIMBX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
BND
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMBX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMBX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIMBX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
BIMBX
BND
BIMBX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMBX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.93 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.75 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 4.78 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMBX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.93 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.04 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.34 | 0.30 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.59 | +0.85 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMBX and BND is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BIMBX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
BIMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than BND's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I | 2.24% | 2.27% | 4.07% | 4.48% | 4.99% | 2.62% | 1.31% | 3.90% | 8.93% | 4.08% | 5.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.93% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
BIMBX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMBX and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMBX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -18.58% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.61% | -2.44% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.50% | -17.91% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.73% | -18.58% | +9.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -2.54% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -3.07% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.90% | +0.11% |
Volatility
BIMBX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 1.56% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMBX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.63% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.83% | 2.52% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 4.30% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 6.00% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 5.52% | -2.00% |