BILT vs. USNG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BILT returned 17.98% vs 32.07% for USNG. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.

Performance

BILT vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 25.43% return.

BILT

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 8.99%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.07%

USNG

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 12.87%
• YTD: 25.43%
• 1Y: 32.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	$2.38M	$1.70M	$1.65M
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	$437.77K	$274.58K	$158.86K

BILT vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	14.30%	4.16%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	25.43%	4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BILT and USNG is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

BILT vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BILT

BILT Risk / Return Rank: 81
BILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BILT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BILT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 76
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BILT vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BILT	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.79	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.51	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	2.62	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	10.67	-0.07

BILT vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILT Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILT and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BILT vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum USNG drawdown of -11.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILT	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-11.93%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-11.93%	+6.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-8.47%	+6.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-1.85%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	2.93%	-1.15%

Volatility

BILT vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) is 3.10%, while Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that BILT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BILT	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	6.49%	-3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	13.82%	-5.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	17.46%	-7.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.31%	17.29%	-6.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.31%	17.29%	-6.98%

BILT vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BILT vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than USNG's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	5.70%	0.99%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.54%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILT and USNG in my portfolio?

BILT and USNG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BILT or USNG?

USNG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to BILT (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILT dropped -5.38% vs USNG's -11.93%.

Which ETF is better, BILT or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 32.07% vs 17.98% for BILT. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BILT or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 32.07% return vs 17.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BILT or USNG?

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BILT or USNG?

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 1.54% for USNG.

What is the main difference between BILT and USNG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.59% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.