BILT vs. SLV
BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BILT is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. BILT is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
BILT vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -19.03% return.
BILT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 15.55%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -32.46%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 1Y
- 48.90%
- 3Y*
- 31.65%
- 5Y*
- 16.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
BILT vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 15.92% | 4.16% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -19.03% | 92.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILT and SLV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILT vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLV
BILT vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILT vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -76.28% | +70.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -50.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -50.61% | +50.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -44.67% | +43.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.60% | — |
Volatility
BILT vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 61.10% | -50.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 36.85% | -26.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 32.17% | -21.83% |
BILT vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILT vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.62% | 0.99% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILT and SLV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
BILT is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SLV is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for BILT and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer