PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILT vs. GLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILT vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than GLIX's 9.30% return.


BILT

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILT vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
12.39%-0.35%
GLIX
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF
9.30%0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BILT and GLIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILT vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BILT vs. GLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILTGLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

1.29

+0.70

Drawdowns

BILT vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum GLIX drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and GLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILTGLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-7.82%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-3.80%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-2.06%

+0.62%

Volatility

BILT vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILTGLIXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

11.94%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

11.94%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.28%

11.94%

-1.66%

BILT vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILT vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison

BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than GLIX's 1.66% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BILT and GLIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.

GLIX has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.33% for BILT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.96% for GLIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILT and GLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer