BILI vs. IPKW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BILI (Bilibili Inc.) is a stock, while IPKW (Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index. Over the past 5 years, BILI returned -29.49%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for IPKW. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BILI vs. IPKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -22.73% return, which is significantly lower than IPKW's 7.62% return.

BILI

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: 9.83%
• 6M: -42.63%
• YTD: -22.73%
• 1Y: -21.68%
• 3Y*: 4.52%
• 5Y*: -29.49%
• 10Y*: —

IPKW

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 5.27%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: 22.52%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILI vs. IPKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BILI Bilibili Inc.	-22.73%	35.78%	48.81%	-48.63%	-48.94%	-45.87%	360.37%	27.62%	48.88%
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF	7.62%	45.50%	10.56%	15.12%	-12.81%	11.41%	16.18%	20.26%	-20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BILI and IPKW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018	0.38

Return for Risk

BILI vs. IPKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILI

BILI Risk / Return Rank: 27
BILI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BILI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BILI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BILI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BILI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

IPKW

IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 63
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILI vs. IPKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BILI	IPKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	1.66	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	2.36	-2.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.30	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	2.68	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	8.39	-9.17

BILI vs. IPKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILI Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the IPKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILI and IPKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BILI vs. IPKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than IPKW's maximum drawdown of -47.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and IPKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILI	IPKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.30%	-47.24%	-47.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.57%	-9.14%	-46.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.57%	-17.77%	-37.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.28%	-32.56%	-59.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.85%	-1.03%	-86.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.29%	-8.94%	-49.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.88%	2.92%	+24.96%

Volatility

BILI vs. IPKW - Volatility Comparison

Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) at 3.50%. This indicates that BILI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BILI	IPKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.10%	3.50%	+8.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.67%	12.40%	+23.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.77%	14.80%	+33.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.98%	17.02%	+61.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.66%	17.73%	+55.93%

Dividends

BILI vs. IPKW - Dividend Comparison

BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BILI Bilibili Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF	3.48%	3.55%	4.12%	2.66%	3.77%	7.37%	1.45%	2.41%	2.61%	0.93%	2.82%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILI and IPKW in my portfolio?

BILI and IPKW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BILI or IPKW?

BILI has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to IPKW (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILI dropped -94.30% vs IPKW's -47.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.