BILI vs. IPKW
BILI (Bilibili Inc.) is a stock, while IPKW (Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index. Over the past 5 years, BILI returned -30.23%/yr vs 9.34%/yr for IPKW. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BILI vs. IPKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -26.76% return, which is significantly lower than IPKW's 6.82% return.
BILI
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -26.76%
- 6M
- -29.92%
- 1Y
- -1.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- -30.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IPKW
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
BILI vs. IPKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILI Bilibili Inc. | -26.76% | 35.78% | 48.81% | -48.63% | -48.94% | -45.87% | 360.37% | 27.62% | 29.80% |
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 6.82% | 45.50% | 10.56% | 15.12% | -12.81% | 11.41% | 16.18% | 20.26% | -20.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILI and IPKW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILI vs. IPKW — Risk / Return Rank
BILI
IPKW
BILI vs. IPKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILI | IPKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.34 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 2.94 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 10.12 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILI | IPKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.87 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | 0.55 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.60 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
BILI vs. IPKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than IPKW's maximum drawdown of -47.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and IPKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILI | IPKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.30% | -47.24% | -47.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.06% | -9.14% | -42.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | -17.77% | -35.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.97% | -33.18% | -59.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.48% | -1.77% | -86.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.90% | -8.99% | -48.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.00% | 2.65% | +19.35% |
Volatility
BILI vs. IPKW - Volatility Comparison
Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a higher volatility of 18.95% compared to Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) at 4.25%. This indicates that BILI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILI | IPKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.95% | 4.25% | +14.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.27% | 11.88% | +24.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.24% | 14.31% | +35.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.19% | 17.01% | +62.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.85% | 17.91% | +55.94% |
Dividends
BILI vs. IPKW - Dividend Comparison
BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILI Bilibili Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 3.49% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 2.66% | 3.77% | 7.37% | 1.45% | 2.41% | 2.61% | 0.93% | 2.82% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILI and IPKW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILI has higher volatility (18.95%) compared to IPKW (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILI dropped -94.30% vs IPKW's -47.24%.
IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILI and IPKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer