PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILDX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return.


BILDX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.90%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
0.75%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%0.39%5.66%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BILDX and GUGAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.84

The correlation between BILDX and GUGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILDX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILDXGUGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

4.82

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

14.23

-7.08

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILDX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-38.57%

+22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-1.16%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-6.12%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-20.53%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-6.72%

+5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-11.26%

+8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.39%

+0.31%

Volatility

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that BILDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILDXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.00%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

1.30%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

2.80%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

6.57%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

5.42%

-1.33%

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than GUGAX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILDX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than GUGAX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.94%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%0.00%0.00%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILDX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILDX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILDX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer