BILD vs. USNG

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BILD returned 18.00% vs 40.76% for USNG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.

Performance

BILD vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILD achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 32.49% return.

BILD

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: 10.13%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 1Y: 18.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USNG

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: 26.63%
• YTD: 32.49%
• 1Y: 40.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILD vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	10.40%	8.00%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	32.49%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BILD and USNG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.30

BILD vs. USNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BILD	USNG
Utilities	49.7%	4.9%
Industrials	21.9%	14.9%
Energy	18.2%	77.0%
Communication Services	4.3%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Financial Services	1.1%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

BILD vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILD

BILD Risk / Return Rank: 62
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 53

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 90
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILD vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BILD	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.43	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.31	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.40	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	6.01	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.28	17.20	-9.92

BILD vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILD Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILD and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BILD vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILD	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.78%	-6.82%	-7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.05%	-6.82%	+0.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-3.32%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-1.61%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	2.39%	+0.09%

Volatility

BILD vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) is 3.37%, while Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that BILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BILD	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	5.32%	-1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.19%	12.87%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.98%	16.84%	-5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	16.71%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.13%	16.71%	-3.58%

BILD vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BILD vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than USNG's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	4.67%	3.05%	5.53%	0.52%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.45%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILD and USNG in my portfolio?

BILD and USNG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BILD or USNG?

USNG has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BILD (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILD dropped -14.78% vs USNG's -6.82%.

Which ETF is better, BILD or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 40.76% vs 18.00% for BILD. On fees, BILD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BILD or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 40.76% return vs 18.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BILD or USNG?

BILD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for USNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BILD or USNG?

BILD has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 1.45% for USNG.

What is the main difference between BILD and USNG?

They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BILD and 0.59% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.