PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BIL has underperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 2.18%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and SPYD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+18.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+172.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.91

1.24

+86.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

355.35

2.33

+353.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,817.77

6.77

+2,811.00

BIL vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.71, which is higher than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71

1.42

+18.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

0.42

+12.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

0.44

+8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.78

0.47

+2.31

Drawdowns

BIL vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-46.42%

+45.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-7.05%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-16.13%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.10%

-22.25%

+22.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

-46.42%

+46.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.11%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-6.17%

+5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

2.43%

-2.43%

Volatility

BIL vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.05%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

2.57%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

7.71%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

11.62%

-11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

16.13%

-15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

19.78%

-19.52%

BIL vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIL vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and SPYD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYD has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.

BIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPYD is S&P 500. BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BIL and 0.07% for SPYD.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer