PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. NVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. NVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than NVR's -11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BIL has underperformed NVR with an annualized return of 2.23%, while NVR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.


BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.77%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
2.23%
ALL TIME*
1.37%

NVR

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.68%
6M
-14.74%
YTD
-11.60%
1Y
-13.15%
3Y*
1.07%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
14.06%
ALL TIME*
18.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. NVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.95%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
NVR
NVR, Inc.
-11.60%-10.83%16.83%51.77%-21.94%44.83%7.13%56.28%-30.53%110.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and NVR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. NVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NVR
NVR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. NVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILNVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+19.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+153.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

69.15

0.94

+68.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

348.23

-0.38

+348.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,469.46

-0.76

+2,470.22

BIL vs. NVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.20, which is higher than the NVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and NVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIL vs. NVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum NVR drawdown of -96.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and NVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILNVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-96.72%

+95.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-34.88%

+34.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-43.94%

+43.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.08%

-43.94%

+43.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

-46.13%

+45.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.04%

+35.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-24.21%

+23.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

17.30%

-17.30%

Volatility

BIL vs. NVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.07%, while NVR, Inc. (NVR) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILNVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

10.27%

-10.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

21.94%

-21.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

27.99%

-27.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

27.80%

-27.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

32.10%

-31.84%

Dividends

BIL vs. NVR - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
NVR
NVR, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and NVR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVR has higher volatility (10.27%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs NVR's -96.72%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.20 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and NVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer